Sunday 14 December 2014

Why Murphy was the Wrong Choice for Scottish Labour

Jim Murphy emerged victorious from yesterday’s Scottish Labour leadership election. Despite his decisive win with 55% of the vote in the first round, he was definitely the wrong choice for Labour and for Scotland

So why do I think Murphy is the wrong choice for Scotland? The reason is that he does not represent what the Scottish electorate believe, nor what they want in a politician. Murphy has been a Westminster politician since 1997, when he won election to his seat of _____, since then he has plotted a course that marks himself as hardline New Labour. Amongst his positions that offends many socialists is his defence of the disaster in Iraq, his support for Israel and Trident, and his general neo-liberal approach to foreign policy. To make matters worse his history as a politician is sketchy, back in the 1996 whilst he as President of the NUS (National Union of Students) he changed the policy of NUS support for the student grant despite the fact that the opposite had been agreed at the NUS’ conference in Derby that year. He was condemned by a group of Labour MPs in the House of Commons for his “intolerant and dictatorial behaviour” as President of the NUS. More recently in 2012 (two years after the original expenses scandal) he was caught using a loophole which allowed him to claim £20,000 in expenses for renting out accommodation in London, whilst simultaneously renting out property he owned.  

Facing off against Murphy were MSPs Neil Findlay and Sarah Boyack. If Scottish Labour had been thinking straight, they would have chosen Findlay as he was the perfect candidate for Scotland. Unlike Murphy, Findlay was not a career politician having only joined the Scottish Parliament in 2011 after spending 30 years in various professions, including brick layer and teacher. He was by far the favoured candidates of the Unions, having received official backing from ten of them. His policies were much more socialist than Murphy’s, which makes him more in line with the Scottish electorate. Findlay opposes Trident (Britain’s nuclear weapons program) and PFIs (Private Finance Initiatives) in the NHS, he also wants to renationalise the railways and build 100,000s of new homes. He also is very pro-Palestine and wants to make the living wage the minimum wage.

Many Scottish voters are dissatisfied with Labour, they believe that the Party has drifted too far to the right over the past decade. In the last six months support for the SNP has surged in the polls, at Labour’s expense. If Labour wants to win back people who have defected in recent months, the Party needed to elect someone who was in tune with what Scottish people wanted.


When given the choice between a candidate whose policies are similar to those of the Scottish electorate in the form of Neil Findlay, and a candidate who is a Blairite and a Westminster MP in the form of Jim Murphy, Scottish Labour chose the latter. Labour faces a wipeout in the 2015 General Election, Findlay could have stymied that. I believe that Murphy, despite his charisma, will contribute to the wipeout.